![]() ![]() Of the Go compiler on amd64 and the most recent version of g++ – 4.8.0, which was (Update: In this updated post, we will be using the most recent development snapshot Since C++ was the fastest language in the paper, the comparisons here with C++ should Programs in either of those languages, so the comparison would be unfair. ![]() (We will not be using Java or Scala, because we are not skilled at writing efficient Go compiler and the version of g++ that ships with the Ubuntu Natty In this blog post, we will be using the most recent weekly snapshot of the 6g Hundt’s paper does not specify which versions of the C++, Go, Java, and Scala (Update: Due to recent optimizations of libstdc++ in gcc, the memory reduction is now 3.7x.) ![]() The Go program presented in that paper runs quite slowly, making itĪn excellent opportunity to demonstrate how to use Go’s profiling tools to takeīy using Go’s profiling tools to identify and correct specific bottlenecks, we can make the Go loop finding program run an order of magnitude faster and use 6x less memory. Those programs to draw conclusions about typical performance concerns in these In a flow analysis pass of a compiler, in C++, Go, Java, Scala, and then used The paper implemented a specific loop finding algorithm, such as you might use Russ Cox, July 2011 updated by Shenghou Ma, May 2013Īt Scala Days 2011, Robert Hundt presented a paper titled ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |